Skip to main content

Pinnacle or Premiere? My video editing story

Hello.I have been editing for 5 years wedding.First I used pinnale studio v11.I needed a montage card to import videos from my camera so someone recommended me pinnacle.At first I had a lot of problems while editing (blank gaps becase I used filmstrip not a timeline lol,I had render problems,capture format etc) Of course these problems happened becase I did knew how to use pinnacle but after one year I became a pinnacle expert,I was able to edit fast,make beautiful videos,footage,add my own effects etc.I upgraded from studio 11 to 14 and later 15.But every version till 18 had a thing in common,problems exporting DVD video,missing audio on export.I fixed these problems using third party programs such nero or power director but my work became growing and I hadnt time to capture import export import again to fix audio problems so I thought to use pinnacle v17.Now I still had Hollywood Fx and a lot of timeline tracks.I was happy but my first problem was video tracks.I edited a 4 hour wedding and I removed something (a clip) on the middle of project but what I saw was a lot of changes on my project,everything almost crashed,my titles were moved,light leaks transitions also so I deleted the project and starded it again with pinnacle v15.The only reason why I used pinnacle was hollwood fx.I started using adobe premiere but for one month or 3-4 wedding projects,I had not any problem,everything was okay.I used premiere in my second computer  Intel Pentium D ,3 gb ram and 128mb graphic card premiere was faster,faster than pinnacle on my main pc 4gb ram quad core and 512 graphic card.What I liked mostly in premiere were defaul transition because I use a lot of dissolves on my videos.Also when I start or stop rec my camera moves a little bit so I can delete 1 sec or more to every clip at once.Amazing.Premiere is faster than pinnacle doesnt have problems , is professional and very easy to use.I sufered less on premiere.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Video format explained and compared

 This article explains main video formats and later compares with photos the quality. Audio Video Interleave (.avi) Developed by Microsoft and released with Windows 3.1 way back when false teeth were still made out of wood, AVI files have been a work horse of digital video. Although its popularity has been waning, lots of legacy video in AVI can be found all over the web. More recently, AVI has been abandoned for Microsoft's WMV (Windows Media Video). One of the most maddening things about AVI today is that the format doesn't allow for specifying an aspect ratio, so a 16:9 AVI video may start displaying at 4:3 - this is less of a problem if your player allows you to manually select aspect ratios. If you're watching in the non-pro version of QuickTime though, you'll have to learn to live with people being unusually narrow. Advanced Systems Format (.asf) ASF is a proprietary Microsoft container that usually houses files compressed with Microsoft's ...
3 comments
Read more

New Sony A7R III Specs

Inside the a7R III is a 42.4-megapixel back-illuminated full-frame Exmore R CMOS sensor. Despite its high megapixel count, the a7R III is fast with a continuous shooting speed of up to 10fps with full AF/AE tracking — this is twice as fast as the 5fps offered by the a7R II.Using either the mechanical shutter or the completely silent shooting mode, you can capture a burst of up to 76 JPEG/RAW photos and 28 uncompressed RAW files. In live view, you can shoot at 8fps with minimal viewfinder/LCD lag. The updated BIONZ X processing engine can also process images 1.8 times faster than the a7R II. While a batch of photos is being written to the memory card, many of the camera’s key features are still usable — things like the Function and Menu buttons as well as image playback and organization. Compared to the a7R II, the new a7R III also features new technologies — a gapless on-chip lens design and anti-reflective sensor coating — to achieve better low-light performance and wider dynamic...
Post a Comment
Read more

1100 $ AMD system to edit 4K

Amd recently has released some great CPU with high cores and low prices. About 305$ you can get an editing beast with 8 cores @3.7 GHz. This cpu will be enough to edit smoothly. There are more expensive cpu and higher cores or higher frequencies but to be honest we don't need real time exporting. You can have a break and drink a coffee while exporting your video. Memory is important. Lower the size the more time it takes to do task. I recommend 16GB DDR4. (2400Mhz or more is great also). That amount will make switching between applications easier and faster. So right now we spent 305 dollars for cpu and 150 for memory (RAM). Sum is 455 $. Lets suppose you are upgrading your system so you have some hard drives and some ssd maybe. I love SSDs for system and as a drive for footages. For the system Samsung EVO 970 will do a great job for 90$ ( Sata m.2 250GB @Read speed up to 3400 MB/s). Asus x470 Pro is a great mainboard for 160$. Also find power supply more than 500w. I recommen...
2 comments
Read more