Skip to main content

Why Premiere is much better than Pinnacle

Why Premiere is over Pinnacle.
Pinnacle Studio is the best software for beginners  but does not offer much for professional editors.  Here are some keys where Pinnacle Studio fails.
-Use of computer resources.  Editing a short clip is great but when you add some hours of videos the program starts to respond less and you cant edit as fast as you can.
-Hollywood  FX are really  nice but noy for professionals.  It shows nothing more than an amateur  work.  (Who needs page peels, books opening and birds flying as an transition?)
- Appearence.  Till Pinnacle  15 I was really amazed  with its appearance but from 16 to 20 or 21 last versions I dont like it.  Im not judging  by my preference but Its not practical. Effects tab scrolling  down is really boring.
-Too much versions. Still from pinnacle studio 9 which I remember  to 10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18_19,20....  What the hell is going on?  Looks like Pinnacle has bugs and thats why every  year new versions  are introduced.


<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
     style="display:block; text-align:center;"
     data-ad-format="fluid"
     data-ad-layout="in-article"
     data-ad-client="ca-pub-6558662448338227"
     data-ad-slot="5818719691"></ins>
<script>
     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>


Back to Adobe Premiere which  doesn't  have premade effects  but allows you to create new ones.  One point that pinnacle wins is that in Pinnacle you can add keyframes,  but in premiere no.  Premiere is great for subtitles,  color grading,  editing multi sequences in one project and copying fron one to another.
I have been editing since 2009 and in 2014 leht pinnacle forever for Adobe Premiere

Comments

  1. I have been installing EDIUS pro 8 for a year.
    I upgrade for free to 8.5.
    The program is fast, stable, perfect collor correction.
    I do not want anything else. I am very satisfied.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Video format explained and compared

 This article explains main video formats and later compares with photos the quality. Audio Video Interleave (.avi) Developed by Microsoft and released with Windows 3.1 way back when false teeth were still made out of wood, AVI files have been a work horse of digital video. Although its popularity has been waning, lots of legacy video in AVI can be found all over the web. More recently, AVI has been abandoned for Microsoft's WMV (Windows Media Video). One of the most maddening things about AVI today is that the format doesn't allow for specifying an aspect ratio, so a 16:9 AVI video may start displaying at 4:3 - this is less of a problem if your player allows you to manually select aspect ratios. If you're watching in the non-pro version of QuickTime though, you'll have to learn to live with people being unusually narrow. Advanced Systems Format (.asf) ASF is a proprietary Microsoft container that usually houses files compressed with Microsoft's ...

New Sony A7R III Specs

Inside the a7R III is a 42.4-megapixel back-illuminated full-frame Exmore R CMOS sensor. Despite its high megapixel count, the a7R III is fast with a continuous shooting speed of up to 10fps with full AF/AE tracking — this is twice as fast as the 5fps offered by the a7R II.Using either the mechanical shutter or the completely silent shooting mode, you can capture a burst of up to 76 JPEG/RAW photos and 28 uncompressed RAW files. In live view, you can shoot at 8fps with minimal viewfinder/LCD lag. The updated BIONZ X processing engine can also process images 1.8 times faster than the a7R II. While a batch of photos is being written to the memory card, many of the camera’s key features are still usable — things like the Function and Menu buttons as well as image playback and organization. Compared to the a7R II, the new a7R III also features new technologies — a gapless on-chip lens design and anti-reflective sensor coating — to achieve better low-light performance and wider dynamic...

1100 $ AMD system to edit 4K

Amd recently has released some great CPU with high cores and low prices. About 305$ you can get an editing beast with 8 cores @3.7 GHz. This cpu will be enough to edit smoothly. There are more expensive cpu and higher cores or higher frequencies but to be honest we don't need real time exporting. You can have a break and drink a coffee while exporting your video. Memory is important. Lower the size the more time it takes to do task. I recommend 16GB DDR4. (2400Mhz or more is great also). That amount will make switching between applications easier and faster. So right now we spent 305 dollars for cpu and 150 for memory (RAM). Sum is 455 $. Lets suppose you are upgrading your system so you have some hard drives and some ssd maybe. I love SSDs for system and as a drive for footages. For the system Samsung EVO 970 will do a great job for 90$ ( Sata m.2 250GB @Read speed up to 3400 MB/s). Asus x470 Pro is a great mainboard for 160$. Also find power supply more than 500w. I recommen...